Greg

Every Saturday, I work 7AM to 7PM as an EMT doing inter-facility transports. These Saturdays have taught me something: the moment people stop walking, they start dying.

Because once most people stop walking, they give up taking care of themselves. And in modern American society, once someone who doesn’t have money stops taking care of themselves, they get sent somewhere like “Garden Grove Skilled Nursing” where they are kept alive, but just barely, by techs making ten cents above minimum wage and nurses assigned three times the legally mandated maximum number of patients. 

And living at Garden Grove* is a life worse than death. You lie in your bed and watch your TV and eat your gruel and digest it and then soil yourself and lie in your filth and call out for help but none comes until two hours later when a manager yells to “fix that smell” and they find you and clean you up. And you watch your mind unravel and degenerate and slowly come apart because nobody with a normal, functioning brain could ever last at Garden Grove. And then, after a few weeks or months or years or decades of life without living, you eventually die. 

Unless you’re Greg*. Greg is a white man in his early 40s with tattoos on both shoulder caps wearing a sleeveless tee and lying on a gurney in the emergency room hallway near the corner they usually put the drunks. He’s got a barrel chest, thick arms, and skinny, atrophied legs—he was paralyzed from the waist down in an accident that broke his neck about five years ago. That was the second time he’s broken his neck, and this time, the doctors and physical therapists couldn’t fix it. Greg’s about 250 pounds and was probably a little under six feet tall when he could still stand. In other words: he’s built like a tank. 

Greg came to the hospital because he was moving himself to his manual wheelchair since his powered one was broken and felt a sudden recoil and a sharp pain in his shoulder. He tried to push through the pain for a few days, and then went to physical therapy and got told that they would not do any normal PT because he obviously needed to go to the damn hospital. And so now here he is, and they scanned his shoulder and told him that he did indeed injure it, and now he’s going to need to make an appointment with orthopedics so that they can get him started on getting all fixed up. He’s pissed off about it—now his shoulder is fucked and he’s going to have to go through months of rehab before he gets it back to full function, and he needs his shoulders working so that he can be properly independent because Greg doesn’t live at a place like Garden Grove—Greg lives at home. 

Actually, that statement is far too passive. Greg fights to live at home. Aggressively. Voraciously. Constantly. He keeps up the strength to move his 250 pounds of bulk from the wheelchair to the commode and back. He refuses to allow anyone else to clean him. He showers himself and cooks for himself and feeds himself and goes to the bathroom without assistance. He asserts his own dignity and independence in a situation where such an assertion is a radical act. 

The system is not built to support someone like Greg; it is built to funnel people into Garden Grove because Garden Grove is a much simpler, neater way of “handling” the Gregs of the world. But Greg has pushed back against the pressures of this system. He’s pushed for referrals, resources, tools, and people who can help him to live his life with dignity. He has to fight tooth and nail for these things! People don’t want to help him do this because figuring out how to help this man maintain his dignity and independence while still living in his own home is a lot harder and more legally risky than just shipping him off to Garden Grove like they do with all the others. Because as Greg told me, if you’re paralyzed “they treat you like you’re intellectually disabled”—like you are someone who is not capable of adding a relevant, meaningful voice to the conversation. 

But Greg keeps fighting. He demands to be taught how to give himself the enema he needs to have a bowel movement. He wears down his insurance until they give him the powered wheelchair which enables him to reach high shelves. He goes to physical therapy most days of the week and keeps up his strength because he will be independent and he will maintain his dignity and nobody is going to make that happen but him. 

I learned all of this about Greg in the back of the ambulance, taking him home from the hospital. As we worked our way back to his apartment, he was brainstorming how he’d handle the new challenge of only having one usable shoulder—he was pretty pissed about it all, but he was thinking out how it could work. He talked through how physical therapy would be different now with one working arm, and complained that it would probably take him weeks to find an opening for an appointment about his shoulder. He also mentioned his job search—he’s trying to find a 9-to-5 where he can work remotely, and he was recently talking with one of his doctors about becoming a patient advocate; the work appealed to him. 

Maybe if Greg’s powered wheelchair wasn’t broken, or if it had gotten fixed faster, he wouldn’t have overtired his shoulders and gotten injured. Maybe if the healthcare system was designed to support people in living independently instead of consigning them to a life of dependence, he wouldn’t have to fight as much as he does for every inch. Lots of maybes, but Greg doesn’t seem to dwell in them—he just does whatever needs to be done. 

On my Saturday night drives home from my EMT job, I typically call my mom; that night, I told her about Greg. She was as impressed as I was—the sentiment was colored by the fact that my younger sister has Down Syndrome, and so my parents have been fighting for the last eighteen years so that my sister can have that same self-determination that Greg is striving for. 

After hearing about Greg and his battles, my mom asked me something which stuck with me. She asked me if I’d asked Greg what tools he was missing—tools he thought could be useful for him in the future to continue maintaining his independence. And I realized that I never did. 

I am twenty-one years old, and I don’t know what my career will look like in the future. All I know is that I want to give people the tools to help themselves—to give themselves agency, dignity, and independence. I don’t want to “fix” them—people are not problems to be solved. I want to work with the people who will never be all-the-way “normal,” and I want to help them take and keep control of their lives. 

I want to design for Greg. 

*pseudonyms

Olin and Violence

A few weeks ago, the defense company Skydio was featured in PGP news. Skydio makes drones used for surveillance and policing, and was founded by Olin alumni. Many of you may remember that in 2024, Oliners for Palestine called for Olin to break ties with Skydio because of their support of the U.S. and Israel’s genocide of Gaza. In recent weeks, PGP’s job boards have also included Palantir, a defense company that has similarly supported Israel’s actions in Gaza and the West Bank. Their technology is used in the U.S. to surveil and target people for deportation. 

Palantir and Skydio are not the only companies involved in this kind of work. Other companies like Caterpillar, Mathworks, Microsoft, Google and more have all contributed technology to assist Israel’s occupation.2 I point out these two specifically because Skydio was founded by Olin alums and because of the publicity of Palantir’s discriminatory actions. 

These jobs being promoted by PGP News is not reflective of Olin’s stated values. Olin’s mission states, “Olin College prepares students to become exemplary engineering innovators who recognize needs, design solutions, and engage in creative enterprises for the good of the world.” Do Skydio and Palantir’s surveillance technology engage in efforts for the good of the world? Do these companies value the diversity of the Olin student body, or does their work help uphold systems of hatred and bigotry? 

These jobs are showing up at the same time as Olin admin has promised to help all seniors secure jobs by graduation. I sympathize with students struggling to find jobs and internships, but I wonder if this expectation pushes students towards defense jobs when they wouldn’t otherwise consider them. I know many alumni who did not get their first job until after graduation. Why are we rushing this important decision?

Other systemic factors at Olin also push us towards violent and extractive industries. One of the first statistics you’ll see on our website is Olin’s high return on investment and starting salary. This teaches us, even before enrolling, that salary after graduation is one of the most important metrics of success. Olin does not, however, advertise how many graduates become teachers, work for nonprofits, or in their local governments. Nor do these mission-driven, lower paying jobs frequent PGP’s job boards and newsletter. What message does that send to us students about what work is valuable and worth considering? 

The problem of what is considered “good engineering” is endemic to Olin’s broader culture. The narrative that valuable engineering work is purely technical and therefore apolitical, and that innovation is inherently good is widespread on our campus. We make distinctions between “technical” and “non-technical” classes frequently, placing value primarily on the former, and placing the latter as separate from engineering. Courses like Collaborative Design challenge this narrative, but many “technical” classes still lack ethical framing. The result is that we see “good” engineering jobs as those with the most innovative technical work regardless of associated ethical implications. 

Financial needs and incentives inform the job search for many of us. Current social dynamics cast job choice as an individual moral decision; it is up to us to decide if we are willing to work at a defense company because they pay more, and the moral responsibility of where we work reflects back on us socially. This paradigm neglects how class differences inform our financial needs. It also doesn’t acknowledge the ways it is possible to challenge and reduce the harmful work these companies are doing while being employed by them. At the same time, working for these companies undeniably causes others harm, and responsibility for that harm lies somewhere. Olin has a large impact both on our financial needs (via tuition cost) and the type of work we are prepared for (innovative and technical). Therefore Olin is partially responsible for the harm caused by student and alumni work.

I want to recognize that PGP posts Palantir and Skydio jobs in the name of equity. They want to ensure everyone has support in applying to the jobs that they want. However, the claim of equity assumes Olin to be an apolitical institution, ignoring the ways that its policies, curriculum, and other material, including PGP News, constantly shape our political values and beliefs. Think about how your political beliefs have changed since coming to Olin. How do the jobs you see on PGP shift influence where you might want to work? Olin is constantly shaping us politically, but also doesn’t acknowledge institutional political alignment.

I don’t intend this article to be an attack on PGP staff or anyone who chooses to make a living in the defense industry. I do want to highlight the division in our community over what engineering work is valuable and recognize the ways Olin’s systems push us towards violent work. Once we recognize the ways Olin is politically shaping us, it opens our imaginations to alternative politics that recognize diversity of thought and needs on campus without being complicit in systems of violence. 

Please check out the attached sources by scanning the QR code for more information about Skydio and Palantir, including Frankly Speaking articles written by Oliners past. I am also planning to host a discussion about this topic at Expo on May 8th, so I invite anyone to come and participate!

  1. Wellesley’s article about Olin’s response to We See You Skydio posters, https://thewellesleynews.com/18244/news-investigation/olin-administration-removes-posters-on-skydios-ties-to-israel/ 
  2. UN list of companies supplying technology to support Israel’s genocide, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/7/1/un-report-lists-companies-complicit-in-israels-genocide-who-are-they 
  3. Palantir AI used for ICE abductions 
    https://www.aclu.org/news/privacy-technology/palantir-deportation-roundup 
  4. Olin’s “We See You Skydio” campaign https://mronline.org/2025/05/01/tough-on-institutions-not-individuals-resisting-militarism-in-engineering-schools/ 
  5. Past Frankly Speaking article on Skydio https://franklyspeakingnews.com/2024/02/theyre-just-cameras-policing-the-domestic-and-abroad/ 

A Frankly Articulated Argument

“I should write an article for Frankly Speaking!” This is what crosses my mind every time I see the newest edition populating the tables in the dining hall, and yet it’s somehow taken me a few months to get this article from concept to reality. Allow me to show you how to overcome the very same barriers I faced so you can have your very own article published right away in the September issue (my timing is rather poor, isn’t it?).

Now, don’t sit there with this paper in your hands and think to yourself that you have nothing to write about. Local newspapers are meant to build community by testing ideas, promoting healthy discourse, and ultimately helping us learn more about each other. It’s the perfect venue to respectfully share that passionate opinion of yours and engage the bright minds of your peers!

Ideating is as simple as picking out a particularly captivating hot take of yours (shout-out to Sammy and his thoughts on cheese), dropping your thoughts on the latest piece of media you spent some time with (shout-out to Ivy’s book reviews), or even sharing some of your personal experience in that class, project team, club, or off-campus activity you took a chance on.

We all have a lot to learn from each other, and a few more articles per Frankly Speaking issue might help drive student engagement. CORe elections might be more contested, there might be more 30-second videos, and maybe our hearts will even have room for a few more P&M surveys. Where does this engagement piece come from? Well, we noted in Local Democracy (a wonderful class!) that if a town has lively local journalism, it increases voter turnout in elections, reduces candidate bias, prevents polarization, and most certainly keeps people informed. These principles likely don’t fully translate to our cutesy little college, hence my ‘might’s and ‘maybe’s earlier, but the worst that could happen from an uptick in thoughtful Frankly Speaking articles is getting a few more ideas brewing in the mind of the dear reader.

What does this mean for ideating? Well, I’m not suggesting you pump out an article to support your campaign for CORe president, but if you recognize your influence and skip your monthly album review to advocate for having a formal at Olin every semester, it would not go amiss! Hopefully, I’ve convinced you that you should do some ideating for your next Frankly Speaking article. Stay with me now.

You may ask me how you might bring your idea to life in writing if it’s been a year or two since your last English class. After doing some research and analyzing some Frankly Speaking articles with a small set of Olin and Babson students (feel free to ask me for my process if you’re curious), I have five main recommendations for you:

  • Do your research
  • Write from personal experience
  • Understand your audience and adjust accordingly
  • Drop hook after hook until you’re certain your reader is fully committed
  • Use persuasive frameworks such as ethos/pathos/logos or problem/solution/benefit to organize your thinking as needed

If you want to communicate an opinion or write something persuasive, you have to understand what you’re talking about. Usually, this means doing your research. Effective opinion or persuasive pieces often use a constructivist approach that builds on a set of facts or shared understanding to get to an argument and research helps make this possible. As a side effect, showing how your argument is connected to existing sources helps establish its credibility. Addressing any counterarguments that you found while researching is also important, as it gives the reader more control on what they can take away from your writing and allows for good faith interaction between an author and the reader. This is critical for any piece of local news that is meant to enrich a community.

However, sometimes even well-researched pieces with well-executed and logically sound claims fail to connect, potentially due to a lack of personal touch. This is where your lived experience becomes critical, as putting your voice into your writing helps meet your reader halfway and ensure they can relate to what you’re talking about. They are reading because they are interested in what you have to say, and you have to repay that interest ahead of time with personal stories, a strong sense of self, or anything else that affirms the humanity of everyone involved (I’m most certainly knocking AI here).

Integrating your research with your voice will only get you so far without considering your audience. Your credibility and relatability will falter if you don’t recognize that you are bound to your target audience in some capacity. For example, there’s plenty of Olin-specific language or culture such as acronyms, classes, or traditions to address or use as context in your writing so your argument can hit closer to home. Our shared understanding of our values, tensions, and lived experiences as Olin students is an additional basis from which to construct or support arguments designed to be read by each other.

Make sure to start off your writing strong! Even though I believe we should all be reading every article in Frankly Speaking, I also believe you should be ruthless and not give your reader a chance to look away from the page. Use engaging writing and a strong introduction to compel your reader to read the entire piece.

Lastly, there’s plenty of frameworks and tips out there to help with executing an argument. Notice how I didn’t say “create”. I scoured the internet for argument structures, and none of my peers thought them particularly necessary for delivering a strong opinion or persuasive piece. I agree with them that ethos, pathos, and logos, for example, is one version of a checkbox to use to see if your writing is organized and clear. So if you find yourself looking for a metric or two that can tell you how your writing is, I’d recommend you to print out your writing and close your computer. Go find a friend or peer and ask them to check up on your credibility and relatability, along with leaving you any other feedback they deem relevant. Hopefully they don’t leak your insightful argument to Carpe before your article is published. 

Okay, that’s all from me! Knowing that you’ve read all the way through, I’m filled with determination and I hope you are as well. I look forward to seeing your articles next semester :)

Cheers,

ELDN

  1. https://democracyfund.org/idea/how-we-know-journalism-is-good-for-democracy/

Campus Climate Survey Analysis: We NEED Continued Support

TW: sexual assault and sexual misconduct

The Peer Advocates for Sexual Respect (PAs) recently sent out a survey for sexual assault (SA) awareness, similar to the one first sent by the founder of the PAs in 2014. In this frankly speaking article, we aim to publish similar aggregate findings on the perceptions of SA and sexual misconduct from the Olin community.

We sent the survey through an All Students, All Staff, and All Faculty email three times, to reach as wide an audience as possible. Out of 85 total respondents, 81 identified as ‘Current Olin Students’ and 4 identified as ‘Current Staff/Faculty’.

One of our findings was that 12% respondents identified being assaulted by someone who was an Olin student at the time of their assault. Despite the bias from individuals who have experienced sexual assault being more likely to respond, in a school as small as Olin, this suggests SA impacts a non-trivial number of community members.

Another important finding is that many responders have reported that rapid role changes have caused cases to fall through and made navigating support harder, as they had to restart requests for support which was emotionally draining.

Question: How problematic is SA or sexual misconduct at Olin?

Based on this distribution, we find that a total of 95.3% of responders believe that SA is problematic on campus at some level.

The following table shows the percentage by gender category. This is modeled after the PA founder’s original data collection.

Question: How likely do you think it is that you will experience SA or sexual misconduct on campus?

Based on this distribution, we find that a total of 55% of responders believe SA to be likely to happen to them on campus at some level. 

The table below shows the percentage by gender category for the previous distribution:

Question: Do you feel that you have ever been SA’ed?

The table below shows the percentage by gender category for the previous distribution: 

This shows that 30% (24/80) responded ‘Yes’ to having experienced SA either during or before coming to Olin campus. As with all collection of data, there are some factors that are potentially skewing these survey results, namely sampling bias. 

However, it is relevant to acknowledge the fact that SA occurs on Olin’s campus and equally important to acknowledge that members of our community enter Olin’s campus with negative experiences from various backgrounds. Recognising this means being aware that we never know what someone else is dealing with and what comments may cause distress. If you have experienced anything off campus, no matter how long ago, the same resources are still available to you and if you need any support please reach out to one of the listed resources at the end.

Question: Do you feel that you have been/were SA’ed during your time at Olin?

This shows that 16.25% (13/80) responded ‘Yes’ to having experienced SA during their time at Olin.

Question: If you feel that you have been/were SA’ed during your time at Olin, how would you identify the perpetrator(s)?

The main themes we noticed among responses was that the perpetrator identified was often a friend or someone the responder knew well and trusted. Unfortunately this is the most common form of SA. According to RAINN, the nation’s largest anti-sexual violence organization, 60% of SA’s are committed by someone known to the victim. SA committed by known acquaintances, friends, or even partners makes defining SA more confusing and difficult. This often means individuals do not name their experience as SA until much later and these experiences also go under reported as we noticed from responses in the survey.

Question: Is there anything else that you would like to share about your assault(s) that may be shared with the community? 

Olin is known for being a community that watches out for one another. However, themes among responders point to the use of drugs and alcohol making consent unclear. In addition, the culture of amnesty at this institution feels at risk, which could “lead to more underground and unsafe parties” according to one responder.

Another responder notes:

“I still don’t really know if it counts as assault because I didn’t really care at the time [and I had a lot of alcohol]. I really didn’t want this person to kiss me and they knew that, they just waited until they had the opportunity.” 

Consent is an ongoing conversation. It must be asked for continually even if it has been given before and it may be withdrawn at any time, even in the middle of an activity. It must be given enthusiastically and without coercion or under the influence of drugs or alcohol.

A theme identified from respondents to this question is that the small nature of Olin’s community causes frustration when people continue to hang out with those that make them uncomfortable and that there is a continued sense of pressure to do so. Another identified concern is that Title IX cases have been dismissed quickly and that there is a feeling of the perpetrator being believed over the victim.

Question: Did you ever feel there were logistical barriers that made getting support difficult?

This question brought in responses about the transfer of leadership in StAR and how difficult that has made it to know who to reach out  to. Responders have reported that cases have fallen through, requiring them to restart the taxing and emotional process.

“I did the report but it fell through and I don’t have the courage to make another since it took so much out of me.”

A part of the issue is that the main Title IX coordinator is currently both interim and part-time. Because of this, students have not had reliable continued support as the resource may go away at any point and the process restarted.

Questions: 

How knowledgeable are you about where to get help at Olin if you or a friend experienced sexual assault or sexual misconduct?   

and

How knowledgeable are you about where to make a report of sexual assault or sexual misconduct at Olin

The normal distribution indicates that the general community at Olin is somewhat familiar on how to report sexual assault and misconduct at Olin. The relative scale of what someone may conceive as knowing a little versus a lot causes a lot of ambiguity in this data. To support those who wish to submit a report, and those hoping to support others, here is more information of resources on campus:

From Erin and Guilene:

“Olin’s Title IX resources are Erin Clark (she/her), Interim Title IX Coordinator and Guilene Prepetit (she/her), Deputy Title IX Coordinator. We respond to concerns of sexual harassment and other sexual misconduct by working with impacted parties to navigate resources and learn about their options, including how to file a formal complaint for investigation. Erin is available to set up a time to meet virtually during business hours, or in person as needed, and Guilene available Monday through Friday 9 to 5 and is typically on campus Tuesday, Thursday, and Friday in MH320. Someone may reach out to us to ask questions about Olin’s policies and resources, learn about how to file a formal complaint, coordinate with law enforcement, bring to our attention a concern of sexual harassment or misconduct, or seek supportive measures, such as academic flexibility, no contact orders, or educational conversations.”

From Jeanne:

“Jeanne Haley is the Director of Counseling on campus.  She is here Monday through Friday from 8:30 to 5 in Room CC 332.  I can be reached by email.”

Additionally, there is a new page on My.Olin being created under Student Life → Student Resources which lists out members of student facing staff and their roles on campus, which will hopefully continue to be updated as our college evolves.

If you are not wanting to reach out to someone on campus for any reason, please know that there are resources off campus:

  • BARCC: The Boston Area Rape Crisis center offers free, confidential services to empower and heal all survivors of sexual violence ages 12 and older, and their loved ones, regardless of when the violence occurred. 800-841-8371
  • REACH: Provides support, shelter, and education for individuals, families, and communities to overcome domestic violence. 800-899-4000

Final Thoughts

The need for this article was born out of It Happens Here, which is a community event to talk about sexual assault and misconduct at Olin. While these topics are not easy to discuss, ignoring this part of our community is not an acceptable way to treat survivors at Olin. We have tried community sit down conversations and that is frankly not enough.

Instead, there has to be a path forward and it starts with some concrete steps for Title IX and the role of the PAs by:

  • Hosting more community wide trainings
  • Holding community discussions about Title IX issues like the kind in It Happens Here
  • Hiring a full-time Title IX coordinator, potentially with overlap at Babson or Wellesley as this survey has indicated an overlap in cases

We, the PAs, are here to try and create a safer place for students on campus. However, a part of creating a safe space is speaking up about issues and supporting those whose voices are currently not being heard.

Call For An Open Discussion Space At Olin

All of us, from students to faculty, are highly opinionated at Olin. We have sets of beliefs we hold onto dearly, and as we like to claim, we are open to changing our opinions as long as we are presented with facts. I say “claim” because I’ve never seen a public discussion in Olin about any political issue. I know all of us are having these conversations in our friend groups, but why not in public? Because we are afraid to offend people.

Just this Sunday, I hosted a deliberative discussion on immigration for my Local Democracy class, and surprisingly, the most common reason people gave for not attending was not “I have finals,” but “I don’t want to get canceled.” During the discussion, I also realized that people I knew who had different opinions didn’t take the chance to share their viewpoints. It was the same reason: they didn’t want to offend anyone. 

How did we end up in this situation?

I truly believe that the blame is on all of us. Including me! We are all so politicized that whenever someone presents an opinion that conflicts with our belief system, we give a slight disgusted look to that person. I don’t mean this metaphorically. We are literally making a disgusted face, and I mean nearly all of us. And then comes the slow ritual of not talking to them, and not even saying hello when you pass by them. I saw this happen to myself, other people, and I’m 100% sure I gave this face to other people. We are acting like the idea they presented makes them, as a whole, rotten. Well, how do we stop this?

First of all, we’ve got to change our approach. We should stop respecting ideas and start respecting people. If we give this respect to ideas, then a “wrong” idea can lower the respect you give to the person. However, if everyone accepts that even the smartest or the most informed person can have stupid ideas (and we all have stupid ideas that don’t represent us as a person), then we can listen to that person with respect, regardless of the idea. The idea might not be “right,” but the respect we have for the person gives us the ability to discuss it. Otherwise, we will just ignore this person until the rest of our Olin lives, as we currently do.

Secondly, we need a structured environment where everyone can present ideas and represent them without the fear of “offending” or getting “canceled”. This transformation can’t happen in a single night, but this environment can help us train our acceptance muscle. Hopefully, one day, leading to an Olin where everyone can present their ideas without fear in a normal day-to-day discussion. 

There are definitely more ways we can improve the current environment, and I definitely believe the issue is much more complicated than I explained above. Maybe some of you think my rambling about this issue is offensive, or you might say that public discussions actually happen, but I don’t just see them. Regardless, please do not get offended by my ideas and reach out so we can discuss more. Until someone offers a better approach, I want to drop a survey link where you can show your interest in a possible club where we discuss political issues in regular intervals. I don’t know if  I can make this happen, as I’m planning to take 24 credits next semester, but I definitely can’t do this alone, and I’d appreciate it if people who are as passionate as I am would reach out: https://tinyurl.com/OlinDeserveBetter

My Only Important Reflection On Olin

Over my time at Olin, I have loved the honest, community-focused criticisms, praises, ideas, jokes, and everything else that Frankly Speaking has contained. I also enjoy writing and reflecting, and through my four years, I have made it a practice to use the Frankly format to write out my reflections specifically pertinent to Olin. My Google Drive is littered with documents named “Potential Frankly:…” followed by titles of almost a dozen half-finished thoughts. Some I wrote in one-night rages and never revisited, others were thoroughly edited and peer-reviewed only to not be submitted at the last moment. 

I knew I wanted to write one more Frankly Speaking, but I didn’t know what would be actually valuable to focus upon in this “last shot.” I considered revisiting my reflections on creating change at Olin, maybe one about our approach to community building and buy-in. Finally, I thought I was honing into writing about the many reflections I have on the tensions created by Olin’s apoliticalness. 

But in looking through all of my reflections, it became clear that only one was actually important: where the best spots on campus are to birdwatch.

Okay, so it obviously depends what you’re trying to see and when you’re trying to see it, but just gonna go over a generalist tour:

  • Right out the gates, I’m going to lead with a hot take: the maintenance area right inside Parcel B by the soccer fields. You wouldn’t think it, but honestly, great-ass spot to see birds. Not only do you got the open area, a mix of coniferous and deciduous and dead and live trees, BUT you also are sat up on a bit of a hill so you get a better view of the whole tree.
  • Going off this idea, a good climbing tree…Get up there and sit a bit! You’ll see so much cool stuff around ya! Best climbing tree in Parcel B is yours to find, but as a hint, if you walk in a straight line from East Hall to the pond, you’ll walk right by it.
  • Shoot, I didn’t mean to put the cart before the horse here, ‘cause I know some of y’all don’t have a pair of binoculars/bird identification stuff. That’s a-okay! You can check out binoculars from the library (common Olin Library W), and Merlin Bird ID is a great free app for bird identification! If you don’t want all the hassle of identification, I respect though.
  • The whole pond area is just the absolute best. Y’all, I have seen Solitary Sandpipers out there cozy-as-can-be once the native wildflowers grow up over the summer. Isn’t that crazy at Olin?? Also, it’s just great seeing the swallows there along with larger water birds like ducks and herons! 
  • For rarer finds, deeper in the woods is always a good bet. There’s a roughly-beaten path back past the prairie and, for a special treat right now, there’s a pair of nesting Pileated Woodpeckers right along the path!
  • Lastly, the marsh area you pass when driving in is just a classic. There are always Red Tailed Hawks hanging around and the Red Winged Blackbirds make for an amazing sunset experience!

Reach out to me if you got any questions, but otherwise, happy birding and happy time at Olin! Make sure to reflect on the important things. And write your own Franklys too—the more we share as a community, the more we understand each other and grow together, and most importantly, the more birds we see.

My total Olin bird count (as of 4/30): 65 unique species. (Absolutely ROOKIE numbers by the way, other past Olin students have cracked 100 on campus before. Could be you!)

My Advice to Oliners: Do Less

So, you want to get the most out of college. That must mean taking as many classes as possible so that you don’t miss out on any content. Oh, and also be sure to join a project team, because you won’t have success finding a job if you don’t. Summer doesn’t mean a break from technical work; if you can’t get an internship, how are you ever going to be employed after graduation?

I was recently talking to my fellow seniors about what they wish they knew during our first year at Olin. The response that inspired me to write this article was “I wish I was aware of any seniors who weren’t dedicating their life to project teams and who were only taking 12-16 credits per semester finding good jobs after graduation.” I heard that and immediately thought, “Hey, that’s me. I’m a senior with a relatively empty calendar who found a good job in her field.” So now I’m here to tell you my experience and how I got the most out of college (as an E:C).

This right here is my simple advice for happiness: focus your energy on things you enjoy. If you are ever putting time and effort into a class or club and feel that you aren’t getting enough out of it, just stop. You don’t need to get an A in every class or be the most productive member of a project team if you aren’t enjoying it. Instead, choose 2-3 projects/courses/activities that you are most interested in and spend your time delving into those subjects. Next, commit to 1-2 other activities, and complete the minimum amount of work expected from you. This does not mean completely slacking off, but it means becoming less attached to producing quality work and more attached to your general well-being and happiness. If you are on a team, be sure to communicate the amount of time and effort you are able to contribute.

Pro tip: you can take 12 total Olin credits as pass/no credit throughout all your semesters. These can only be applied to courses that aren’t being used for major requirements. However, if there is a non-required elective that you feel is taking up too much of your time, you can apply for pass/no credit, which will remove the stress of maintaining your GPA, if that’s something that’s important to you.

Finally, I want to talk about my experiences with internships. Mainly, the fact that I never did one (although I did do a summer of research at Olin). Internships are important for gaining professional experience and connections, and I recommend pursuing at least one throughout your time at Olin. However, it is not the end of your prospects if you do not manage to get one. They create connections and improve your resume, but are not necessary to get a job after college. Again, I never got an internship, and I feel that it didn’t negatively impact my job search.

*Insert conclusion here* Moral of the story: Marie Kondo your iCal and keep only the commitments that spark joy.

Exploitation, Music, & Beauty in Cinderella

Rodgers + Hammerstein’s Cinderella revels in its seemingly blunt and simple naivete. It’s so bold as to make a scene where its lead preaches about kindness and everyone clapped for it. But as I worked on this show, and found insight from other actors about how they see this world, Cinderella transformed into anything but a plain country bumpkin. R&H’s Cinderella was adapted from a much shorter animated story, well-renowned for its poignant simplicity. Plenty of other simple stories have followed this trajectory into the modern day, but as Cinderella is given space to grow, to reflect on its place in a changing world, the contribution to its own conversation has matured. We are treated to a story of love, and class, and family, and with new messages that call to be heard. 

Part 1: Beauty 

If I were to ask you what Disney’s first adaptation of Cinderella was about on a thematic level, what would you say? You might think of hard work, or inheritance, or staying true to yourself. For now, think about how Disney’s Cinderella spends its energy asking about who is beautiful. Not a beautiful spirit, but external, aesthetic beauty. The stepfamily wears beautiful clothes, but they have ugly faces. The mice are externally ugly, but are capable of creating beautiful things. Cinderella starts out disheveled, but is made the most gorgeous character in the movie with the flick of a wand by the Fairy Godmother, who in this movie is a godly embodiment of beauty. The prince, who is less of a person, is the arbiter of beauty. Not only does he exercise this authority during his ball, but his quest to fit the glass slipper on every woman in the kingdom is a reinforcement of the power to decide who is and is not beautiful. And on the condition that Cinderella is beautiful, and through no other standard, she gets to live happily ever after. 

When we look at the events of the story, we can draw a conclusion about what Disney’s Cinderella might be trying to say. Why was Cinderella the most beautiful? Well, her dress was perfectly molded against her body. People who tried the slipper could not fit it because they were trying to fit a form that was not theirs. In this way, the story suggests that everyone has their own unique form of beauty tailored to them, and happiness lies in discovering that specific and unique style. While there are many ways to read this story, you will see this may offer insight to what future iterations have to say. 

The new 2013 musical is undeniably invested in beauty as well. Cinderella once again dawns her gown as the prettiest woman at the ball. There are new songs dedicated to how beautiful the prince is. Most notably however, the show opens with a chorus about how beautiful the world is, with a closing remark, “It makes you wish the world could be as lovely as it looks”. This is our first clue suggesting how the musical expands on the ideas of its source material. Right from the beginning, there is a relationship between beauty and goodness. And as the show begins, it’s implied they do not coincide.

Part 2: Exploitation 

The largest plot change in R&H’s Cinderella can be explained through the introduction of Sebastian and Jean-Michel. Sebastian lies and misrepresents, aiming to convince everyone that what he asks of his companions is not worth the trouble of understanding. Jean-Michel, by contrast, is fervent with his transparency about the work and sacrifice that is required of serving others. Not only does he run a soup kitchen, but the source of his food is from those who donate. These two characters contrast each other because both of them know how to—or not to—exploit others for their own gain. 

Everything about the world of Cinderella warps itself around the relationship each character has toward the power to exploit others. Sebastian believes it is natural and worth rewarding to use other people as stepping stones in pursuit of opulence. Those who agree with him participate most readily in the ridicule competition. Jean-Michel believes that exploitation is a useless tool when everyone around you is willing to serve the community. It is why he scavenges, and begs, and rallies, and inspires. When we choose not to exploit, we are granted something greater—loyalty.  

When Marie, the fairy godmother, enters stage, she unifies these seemingly separate ideas around beauty and exploitation. If Ella is the most virtuous, she is now too made the most beautiful. This is what it looks like when the world is as lovely as it looks. With a flick of her wand, Marie makes the world as we wish it, so long as the pieces are already there to make it so.

Marie tells us that Ella is the first person to show generosity, charity, and kindness, and that because of this, Marie is willing to grant her gifts throughout the show. Ella becomes beautiful in this moment, but there are other canonically beautiful characters such as Prince Topher (for the details are explained throughout the song aptly named “He is Tall”). And what’s Jean-Michel, chopped liver? He’s clearly friends with Crazy Marie, so surely there is a reason she sticks around him. Surely he doesn’t not-know who Marie really is. Is he, too, not worthy of this gift of beauty? If we are left with these questions, we are forced to ask: if these characters are also beautiful, then why? What do they represent, if not generosity, charity, and kindness, that they are so closely aligned with these symbols? 

If according to Disney’s Cinderella, beauty is only achievable by those who align their style with who they are, and in this show, beauty is equivalent to virtue, then we have an answer. Everyone has their own unique way of demonstrating virtue, and in doing so, expressing their inner beauty. For Jean-Michel, his righteous anger drives him to do justice. The Prince demonstrates his best virtue by listening, and seeking out the voices that must be heard. By doing so, he finds himself. Through righteousness, we make the world beautiful. Through listening to others, we hear the music inside ourselves and others.

Part 3: Music 

In “The Prince is Giving a Ball”, Jean-Michel attempts to sing in concert with the town, but is shouted over by Lord Pinkleton. In Topher’s first number, “Me, Who Am I”, the lyrics are discordant. He sings out of sync with the knights, who contradict his words. But as the show continues, there is more harmony. There is more conversation and camaraderie. By the conclusion, everyone sings together for they achieved the unity sought from the beginning of the show. 

To truly harmonize within a chorus, you must listen diligently to the people around you. You must align with their tune, their volume, and their rhythm. It demands care for the people around you. If we can listen, show kindness, generosity, and charity, then we may move in harmony with the rest of the world.

You may wish the world could be as lovely as it looks. But the world is complicated. It’s impossible to find such beauty. So much of life seeks to tell us there is nothing worth hearing besides the rhythm by which we walk this planet, and when we believe that to be so, we become jaded, and we resort to ridicule and exploitation. But if there is ever a doubt in your mind, just remember—that impossible things happen every day.

Nap Time: A Tier List

Hello everyone! If you don’t know me, my name’s Meagan, I’m a senior, and I’m an avid lover of naps. In this article, I’m going to rank all the places I’ve napped on campus. My qualifications are that I’ve been here for four years and was a deeply sleep-deprived Formula PM. Enjoy :) 

S-Tier

  • Shop Bean Bags
    • PEAK in between waterjetting shifts.
  • Eduspace
    • A CLASSIC, centrally located and very comfy. Tragic that it’s not open anymore.
  • Waterfall Bean Bags
    • SOO GOOD; deeply underutilized.
  • NEW EH suite couches
    • *Chef’s Kiss* 
  • Couches in the O
    • THERE USED TO BE A COUCH. I literally zonked out for like a whole hour here. Best nap of my life <3

A-Tier

  • The PARC (MAC 3rd floor couches)
    • I napped here during a Power E all-nighter and was awoken by the loudest thunder and lightning I’ve ever experienced. The couch was comfy though; would do again. 
  • Memorial Lounge
    • Helpful if you don’t want to be disturbed.
  • Quiet Reading Room Green Chairs
    • Trust these are so good; a little public though.
  • The Common
    • Good couch, a little too firm.
  • My First Year Room Floor
    • Many a nap was taken here, not just by me. Long live Mealin. 
  • WH 4th Floor Bean Bags
    • Great, but you may get some strange looks.
  • OLD suite couches
    • Comfy but hella old, like who knows what has been there?
  • Hammocks outside Milas 
  • Great Lawn 
  • The Grass in the O

B-Tier

  • DesNat/CD Couches
    • Just don’t think about what else has happened on these couches. I have napped here during classes and CD meetings. 
  • Downstairs Team Room with Couch
    • RIP this couch. It was kinda dingy though. 
  • Library Floor
    • First year after 4E shenanigans. 
  • Therapy Room
    • Also, RIP that this doesn’t exist anymore.
  • Jam Room
    • While my friends were actively practicing for their band. 
  • WH Antelounge Benches
    • Surprisingly good.
  • WH Lounge Couches
    • Classic, happened more times than I can remember lol 
  • The Stone Wall in the O
  • The Aderondak Chairs in the O
  • The Parcel B Web
    • This one was brief but full of whimsy 
  • Formula Car
    • Ok, technicallyyy, maybe this wasn’t a full nap, but it was aspirational.

C-Tier

  • E-Proto Room
    • Lowkey could’ve been worse?
  • SNORD
    • C’mon, this is a classic. It’s uncomfy though, and I feel bad for the professors. 
  • Crescent Room
    • Sometimes it’s the only space open. 
  • Armchairs Outside of the Board Room
    • Yes, there are chairs there. No, they’re not very comfortable to sleep in. 
  • Pool Room Window Cubbies
    • Yes, this is for real. It was a tad embarrassing…
  • West Hall Nooks – Usually 3rd or 4th floor
    • Usually, while doing Circuits or ESA. :(
  • Floor While Doing “ASMR” 30-Second Videos
    • You’ll have to watch the 30-second video. Yes, I actually slept through that. In the same room. On the floor.

D-Tier

  • Random MAC Classrooms
    • These naps SUCK and only happen out of desperation.
  • Normal Team Rooms
    • Meh, I feel like the other people in the library are judging me. 
  • Outside IT
    • Doing the “head nod” while waiting for them to fix my computer. 
  • LPB Workbench
    • Very bad, no good.
  • Dave’s Pool
    • JK, this didn’t happen.

That’s it, folks! Consider this a warning to get some sleep and not overcommit. Or, if not, think of it as a helpful guide? Whatever floats your boat.

  • Meagan “I promise I get enough sleep now” Lipsman

Credit for Student Government!

Swasti Jain on behalf of Student Government

TL;DR: Students can now get credit for their efforts on Student Government. Nominations for elections are happening until the end of the day TODAY! Nominate yourself or others for CORe/Student Gov. positions by Monday, April 6th at 11:59 pm!

In this first round of elections, we are looking for the following positions:

  • President
  • VP for Finance
  • VP for Communications
  • Director of SAC
  • Club Chair
  • Director of SERV

Over a year ago, I wrote “Jaded Junior: Apathy at Olin” for Frankly Speaking highlighting how easy it was to fall into the patterns of burnout and resignation.

To recap, in my article I write about how I was confronted on my jaded feelings about Olin’s future:

“Swasti, what’s your perspective on Olin’s future?”

And without thinking about my answer I said, “I dunno man, I just want to get my degree and get out of here.”

“That’s so interesting… I didn’t expect you of all people to be so jaded.”

I couldn’t shake the feeling that she was unequivocally right to judge me. I’m not a laid-back, nonchalant person. I am so chalant! I be chalanting!! I get involved in situations that don’t particularly ask for my input. I meddle. I care. And it’s my, perhaps naive, belief that most Oliners chose to be here for that same reason: to be with other engineers who care about making an impact.

In that article I also criticize how Olin’s current structure does not incentivize students to take on additional responsibility when it comes to creating culture and improving student life. Today’s Oliners are chronically stretched thin, wearing several campus identities.

This is why offering ISR credit for Student Government is so impactful. In my own time involved in CORe as Senior Class Representative, I have seen firsthand how much an engaged student body makes a difference in student life.

One of the most powerful things we have at Olin is that one voice can bring about a lot of change, and Student Government can propagate that change by funding any student’s idea.

And I am really proud to say that Student Government has done a whole lot of that:

  • Sushi Night funded by CORe
  • New Weights for EH Gym funded by CORe
  • New Drumkit for Jam room funded by CORe
  • New Skateboards in ball room funded by CORe
  • Ski/snowboard tuning equipment funded by CORe
  • Transportation for Volunteering funded by CORe and now SERV
  • Mardi Gras Party funded by SAC
  • Worked with President May to develop formal guidelines for student groups to host events at her house 

As a senior who refuses to stay jaded, I want to remind you of all of the ways you can advocate for healthy boundaries with culture, creation, and studies. If you have questions about getting credit or anything else, our current President and VPs hold office hours from 11-12 pm Wednesdays in the Dining Hall. Or you could come visit during our meetings on Mondays 5:30-6:30 pm in the Crescent Room!